tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1055932257464975902.post2316354095350793818..comments2024-03-10T23:01:51.493-05:00Comments on Stupid Motivational Tricks / Bemsha Swing: Seeing LanguageJonathanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09371893596402673898noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1055932257464975902.post-47242812585778348282010-06-15T14:28:01.633-05:002010-06-15T14:28:01.633-05:00Too true. But I don't think there is any body ...Too true. But I don't think there is any body of theory (maybe you can think of one) that doesn't have this problem. There are two kinds of thinker that I can appreciate: original thinkers (creators) and careful thinkers (tinkerers).<br /><br />Unfortunately, most writing in any field is careless and derivative. Julian Assange of WikiLeaks <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04858865501469168339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1055932257464975902.post-30070102949362071572010-06-15T13:57:21.686-05:002010-06-15T13:57:21.686-05:00Too bad the Foulcauldians aren't as interested...Too bad the Foulcauldians aren't as interested in this as Foucault himself. They might question they way they write.Jonathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09371893596402673898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1055932257464975902.post-52493420498488366592010-06-15T13:36:15.071-05:002010-06-15T13:36:15.071-05:00Bernard Bolzano approached the theory of science (...Bernard Bolzano approached the theory of science (<i>Wissensschaftslehre</i>) as the style guide (principles of composition) for scientific treatises. "How does the theorist write?" is a quintessentially epistemological question. This is no doubt why Foucault took such an interest in the "enunciative modality" (style) of discourse.Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04858865501469168339noreply@blogger.com