tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1055932257464975902.post4955583022464198466..comments2024-03-10T23:01:51.493-05:00Comments on Stupid Motivational Tricks / Bemsha Swing: Recent WorkJonathanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09371893596402673898noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1055932257464975902.post-29052298874687071422011-10-20T16:26:58.021-05:002011-10-20T16:26:58.021-05:00AHA, US, I see. I am perhaps eccentric since I don...AHA, US, I see. I am perhaps eccentric since I don't have time to keep up on scholarship about this matter. But I always teach these pieces in those intro to criticism and because they address so many general issues. A person who knows enough to understand and use the Gongora one plus the duende one knows a lot, I think.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1055932257464975902.post-76221861553478418322011-10-20T10:38:03.520-05:002011-10-20T10:38:03.520-05:00I know, my university does the same with this jour...I know, my university does the same with this journal: full content after a year. <br /><br />It's a good question you pose. I think they are considered foundational in the US, but not in Spain. Even among Lorca scholars, they are considered crucial to understandig Lorca, but not as foundational texts of a construct of Spanish poetic theory. I hope I am not arguing against a straw man.Jonathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09371893596402673898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1055932257464975902.post-91517567185769618772011-10-19T23:41:01.733-05:002011-10-19T23:41:01.733-05:00We get RQ electronically 1 year late but down the ...We get RQ electronically 1 year late but down the road they'll have the current issue in person (I mean, on paper, I think of that as "in person") now. <br /><br />I'm assuming the answer is in the text but: I hadn't realized those FGL lectures weren't considered central theoretical type texts, they seem pretty much fundamental - but I gather from the abstract that this Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com