Featured Post


I am posting this as a benchmark, not because I think I'm playing very well yet.  The idea would be post a video every month for a ye...

Monday, June 5, 2017

Free Speech for the Weak and not the Strong

You often hear this argument: the speech of the weaker in society should be more protected than the speech of the strong.  So if you are powerful, privileged, etc.. your speech should be less protected.

There are a few things to consider here:

1) This means that someone, in order to be heard, must claim victim status. (The merits of the arguments aren't meaningful anymore.)  So you will find that even people belonging, ostensibly, to powerful, privileged, or influential groups, will start to claim that they are the true victims, once they figure out that that is the way to be heard.

2) In practical terms, the weak or underprivileged need freedom more, because they don't have power in other ways. Hence they have a vested interest in keeping freedom for everyone.

3) It will be the liberal professor, the one who often sympathizes with the less privileged, who will get in trouble with the censors first, before the hardcore racists. I'm sure people who have made these kind of "free speech ... but..." arguments have themselves found themselves censored, more than some conservative economics prof who just keeps his head down.


Anonymous said...

I went to this incredibly manipulative talk, though, apparently very well funded by the university (unless it was by donation, and I really would like to know), by members of the Center for the Victims of Communism (sic) and their guests. It wasn't that it was conservative, it was that it was 100% ideological and tendentious, not academic at all, and really needed not "balance," but some kind of foundation. It was so unsubstantial and also so emotional that it wasn't even worth asking a question or objecting, and I'm not the only one who had this reaction. I did wish for some protesters or smart hecklers, I must say.

Jonathan said...

That sounds creepy. This center was started by conservative congressmen and is funded by the federal govt., from what I can tell.

Anonymous said...

Yes -- I was shocked to discover it had been created by an act of Congress. I want a Center for the Victims of Imperialism, then!