Featured Post

Anxious gatekeeping

Analogous to nervous cluelessness is something we might call “anxious gatekeeping.”   This is desire to police the borders of poetry, or of...

Friday, April 10, 2015

All Grammar is Descriptive

There aren't too kinds of grammars, prescriptive and descriptive. All grammar is descriptive. What we are interested in is what the rule of the language actually are, not what we would like the rules to be according to other extraneous criteria. Grammar is evidence based. The rules can be deduced from the practice of those using the language.

We can use the work of canonical, classical writers, because presumably they are not merely competent native speakers, but also beyond reproach. The Horatian concept of norma loquendi is also useful.

Let's say there is a dog. We have some mofidiers to describe the dog.


hunting

brown

big

Everyone knows that you don't say "brown hunting big dog" or "hunting dog brown big." We don't need to prescribe the order of the adjectives, sit down a child and teach her to rules here, because nobody makes these mistakes.

So what is this so-called "prescriptive" grammar you've been hearing about? Mostly a combination of invented rules and proscriptions against dialectal forms outside of the norma loquendi of educated speakers. There is no prescriptive grammar of the language, since prescriptivists don't care about the actual grammatical rules of the language. They only care about a few rules that can be used to differentiate between the educated and those with less education, or between those who've read certain style manuals and those who have not. Prescriptive grammarians are simply incompetent sociolinguists, who don't even know that that's what they are.

2 comments:

profacero said...

What then of poor grammar, that obscures meaning and interdicts communication?

Here is a counter example, "incorrect" grammar that in fact is better than correct because more vivid.

"I have been knowing that for many years" (instead of "I have known that for many years") -- used when you mean "I have been acutely aware of that and concerned about it, and I have kept it actively in mind as I made practical decisions and manoeuvres" (all of this can be covered by "I have been knowing that")

But what about downright poor grammar, poor control of *any* dialect, incomplete acquisition of *any* language or incomplete alfabetizaciĆ³n? (I deal with this daily and it is downright hard to talk, hard to understand, hard to do things, more like doing things with babies or pets or the hearing impaired, do you see what I mean, or am I just being too prescriptive? What about all the grammar I corrected before I let the student send his paper off to that journal? How do we categorize such activity?)

Jonathan said...

"I've been knowing it" is a good example. It is not a mistake, but an emphasis. Like the different between "I think that... " and "I am thinking that..." Where the latter is more incipient / inchoative in aspect.