Featured Post

Anxious gatekeeping

Analogous to nervous cluelessness is something we might call “anxious gatekeeping.”   This is desire to police the borders of poetry, or of...

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Preface or Introduction?

I prefer the preface to the introduction. The preface puts forward a brief summary of the chapters and says what the book is going to be about. Writing a preface is like writing a grant proposal or plan for the book. The nice thing about it is that you are writing the book while planning to write it at the same time.

Introductions are typically longer, and include more contextual and theoretical background. What I like to do is to make the first chapter do double duty: be introductory in some way, but also present substantive, non-introductory points. For example, in Apocryphal Lorca I used the first chapter to talk about Lorca himself, rather than his American imitators. I wasn't introducing the book, but writing another kind of essay that prepared the ground for the rest of the book.

I'm not saying this is the right way to do it. Your project--or your own personal style of doing things--might require an introduction rather than preface--or both. If you have both you have to keep their functions rigorously separated, which I've always found difficult.

3 comments:

Vance Maverick said...

I'd be interested also to hear your thoughts about signposting -- your book had some of the most emphatic signposts I can remember reading (this may say more about me than about you, of course).

Jonathan said...

I don't know. I probably would be in favor of more subtle sign-posting, though I might not always follow my own advice.

Andrew Shields said...

If your chatter tells you "seamless whole," then you should aim to write a first chapter as you describe it, rather than a preface or an introduction.