"Nonverbal" must be a thing
reality before it's talked about
or after, still hanging around
when words aren't
Once we speak
the jig's up
lemon is nonverbal
until lemon
Scholarly writing and how to get it done. / And a workshop for my own ideas, scholarly and poetic
I am posting this as a benchmark, not because I think I'm playing very well yet. The idea would be post a video every month for a ye...
"Nonverbal" must be a thing
reality before it's talked about
or after, still hanging around
when words aren't
Once we speak
the jig's up
lemon is nonverbal
until lemon
I feel sorry for people abducted by aliens
in the Middle Ages.
No science fiction to help them
frame their understanding
of the sheer terror,
only Lives of the Saints, maybe,
witchcraft, or Scholasticism.
They wouldn't have thought
of medical experiments,
space voyages centuries in the future--
everything they thought they knew
irrelevant, useless, inane.
So it is with us.
What we think we know
isn't much help.
We have many ways to name it--
making love, sleeping or going to bed
with someone, making whoopee.
None, though, seems to name the Dirty Deed
without euphemism, clinical coldness,
or vulgarity. Fucking, too,
is metaphor for a hundred other things we do.
I.
Freedom: a great concept
but nobody knows what
to do with it.
II.
Suppose there were a law
forbidding travel to Nebraska?
That would be a bad thing,
even if you didn't want to go to Nebraska!
III.
Freedom is about things not yet even
desired or imagined. The highest freedom, then,
is the freedom of the imagination: freedom is the surreal
Nebraska, the Nebraska of undreamt dreams.
In The Hatred of Poetry Ben Lerner argues
We like poetry, the idea of it, more than actual poems,
Disappointing in a number of ways and rarely
Possessing the grandeur we associate with the concept.
He is mostly right. Speaking only for myself
Here, I find even poetry I am supposed to like,
In my own tradition of avant-garde and
Experimental poetry, to be dull
Or else pretentious, overly precious, clever,
Or self-indulgent in innumerable ways.
Other poetry I perhaps ought to like is too jokey
Or too earnest, overwritten, too "poetic"
in predictable ways, or too prosaic,
Like this poem I am now writing,
Woodenly written,
Simply dull or not extraordinary in the way that
"Poetry" is supposed to be. Not to mention
The poems of trite civic platitudes and
Overheated political rhetoric.
All this is true, and fairly well-known too,
To anyone with minimal powers of observation.
Yet I feel Lerner is writing.
I do not feel this way at all
About poems like Keats's "To Autumn."
In this case, the poem is superior to any abstract
Or honorific, aspirational idea of Poetry with a capital P.
Moreover, the experience of reading poems like this
And even some others that are not quite so great,
Or great in unkeatsian, unpredictable ways,
By Clark Coolidge, Alice Notely or my friend Tony Robinson
(You can put in your own names here)
Far surpasses any disappointment I feel
At the the vast swaths of crappy poetry and
Has given my life the little meaning that it has.
When I die
My love for Ben Webster's saxophone
Goes to the grave with me
I did not say what they said I said;
And if I did
I didn't mean what they thought I meant.
Derrida put certain words under erasure
Questioning their ability to refer to things
In an easy way; we understand his schtick.
We already knew this, in a way, and if we didn’t
We could have learned it from William Bronk too.
On pharma commercials actors talk
Off their"'moderate to severe" symptoms
Of various diseases.
But surely moderate and severe are opposites?
"Be a good person," they say, but you inherit
from your predecessors an unwinnable war,
epidemics, ecological disasters.
Prolonging the conflict would lead to more death
as would ending it, leaving the country
to same the brutal fanatics as before.
By all means, though, "try to be a good person."
Now my own ideas are being filtered through the faux-Bronk style. I cannot any longer formulate my own idea for a poem, because it all comes out in that mode. But when I go back to read Bronk, his poems seem quite unlike my own; they are more ponderous, heavier. My knock-offs seem flippant in contrast.
That is probably a good thing. At some point I will return to my usual style.
They taught me about people being "wicked,"
Enough to destroy the world in disgust. I was a young child
And couldn't imagine more than schoolboy mischief
Or tracking mud into the house. It didn't add up.
Now it does.
Wars have been fought over theology.
We might as well have fist fights about the rules of chess
Or philosophical debates,
As Wittgenstein once wrote in jest,
About which coffee tastes the best.*
_______
FURNITURE
In dreams I am with friends
Not my actual ones but fictional
Strangers, furnished for me
As though to say: we complete the scene.
ARROGANCE
Is is arrogance to think
My imitations are close
To the real thing? Yes,
Arrogance of particularly modest sort.
"Do unto others... " they say.
I'd like others to tie me up
and perform unspeakable acts on me.
I don't think that's what they had in mind.
I know I've said I don't revise.
Equally true: nothing ever remains
The same.
EXISTENTIAL
There is an itch we can't scratch:
Existence.
I could write imitations of Bronk's ideas using Bronk's own language (more or less), or I could put my own ideas in a Bronkian language, or put Bronkian ideas in a language alien to him, or put my own ideas in a language not Bronkian at all. That would be throwing away the crutch.
Eventually, it will evolve in this direction, just as as my bad poems evolved into good ones.
My new challenge is a poet we might call facilón. He's from Granada and teaches in Virginia, has all the prizes and translated by Forché in one of the best poetry presses in the US. His work is just pretty and super facile, like a Spanish Mary Oliver.