Scholarly writing and how to get it done. / And a workshop for my own ideas, scholarly and poetic
A melody has to catch the ear. A lilt is an up and down movement that has to be asymmetrical or surprising in some way. It can go up, and ...
That's my view. Poetry is a notation that affords emotional precision. It's our most precise instrument for engaging with culture. A society that marginalizes poetry becomes less precise in its emotional life. I think this is a Pound/Kung thesis. Poetry is the rectification of the names of our feeling. It makes our obedience—and our disobedience—more precise. In that sense, poetry is the highest of the arts of being being ruled.
It is. That is why it is more interesting than other genres, from every point of view but the mushy and the fuzzy.
Off topic but still: do you think the reason why many literary critics are dissuaded from analyzing poetry might be how incredibly hard it is to get copyright clearances? This is the first time I analyzed poetry and my publishers are making me ask for permissions for every single verse I quoted. It's driving me nuts.
No -- if they're not interested in poetry, they won't get to that point. Also, I think it is unusual that this publisher asking for permission for every verse. How much are they letting you quote from prose fiction without asking for permission?
To Clarissa, I wouldn't be surprised. Paul Zukofsky made life almost impossibly difficult for a couple of grad-school classmates who had dissertation chapters on Louis Zukofsky; one left the profession and the other was saved by an intercession by Robert Creeley with Zukofsky's publisher.
To Olga, I mean!
Wow, superb post, Thomas. Thank you!
Post a Comment