[So I wrote this today, working on my anti-textbook, which will be my project for 2017; I decided it should end with this memoir.]
In sixth grade, we
were to write a poem as an assignment. At the moment, I decided to be a poet
myself, and that has been my ambition ever since, although in my job is to be a
Spanish professor. My earlier passion had been Greek mythology—and before that
history. I had vague inklings about what poetry was supposed to be. I had found
works by Poe in my Grandmother’s house, and been struck by the coincidence that
a poet should have a name contained in the word poet, and that he had written
poems about women who shared the names of my most literary aunts, Helen and
Lenore. I had also read and enjoyed poems by Milne, from Now We are Six and When We
Were Very Young, as I was learning to read, and had some idea of Robert
Louis Stevenson’s A Child’s Garden of
Verses, which my parents had read aloud to us.
My first idea of
being a poet was that someone would hire a poet to write poems in order to
express messages more eloquently than they could. Naively, I thought that I
should know everything about poetry, so I studied assiduously Babette Deutch’s Poetry Handbook, and a little later X.J.
Kennedy’s An Introduction to Poetry,
which I didn’t realize was a college textbook. Although I considered myself to
be a poet, I took this profession so seriously that I eventually became
something else as well: a reader of poetry. I did write poems during my adolescence,
continuing throughout college, and resuming intermittently at various points of
my adult life, but my real talent, if you can call it that, is to be reader. It
was only later that I realized that a many poets and literary critics are not
particularly capacious readers of poetry. Since I began to study poetry
seriously when I was 11, I had a natural advantage over those who only begin in
college or graduate school. It was not only that I gained time in so doing, but
also that I had the advantage of naivete: I believed that anyone who wanted to
be a poet should undertake a serious study of poetry itself. What I didn’t
realize was that most people’s approach is much more haphazard, and that the
kind of systematic approach I was undertaking was a rarity.
It is probably
true that this approach led me to have less confidence in my own talent as a
poet, and to write less poetry than I otherwise would have. I am not
recommending my method to any other preteens who might be reading this book.
The seriousness of my study also meant that I become obsessed, taking on the
study of poetry as a full time job and often neglecting my studies of other
subjects. Other risks were arrogance and social isolation. I was shocked in my
first college poetry class to hear a fellow student ask when Yeats lived. Later,
teaching a sestina by Jaime Gil de Biedma as a young professor, I was equally
shocked to find that graduate students were unfamiliar with the form.
My father gave me
books like the Kennedy Introduction
and the 1973 edition of The Norton
Anthology of Modern Poetry. After working through the Kennedy book at least
a dozen times, I studied the Norton
endlessly when I was 14, 15, and 16, essentially reading it from cover to cover
over and over again. From there, I discovered my first poetic hero: Cummings,
buying many of his books for about a dollar each and eventually splurging for
the Complete Poems…
No comments:
Post a Comment