In The Hatred of Poetry Ben Lerner argues
We like poetry, the idea of it, more than actual poems,
Disappointing in a number of ways and rarely
Possessing the grandeur we associate with the concept.
He is mostly right. Speaking only for myself
Here, I find even poetry I am supposed to like,
In my own tradition of avant-garde and
Experimental poetry, to be dull
Or else pretentious, overly precious, clever,
Or self-indulgent in innumerable ways.
Other poetry I perhaps ought to like is too jokey
Or too earnest, overwritten, too "poetic"
in predictable ways, or too prosaic,
Like this poem I am now writing,
Woodenly written,
Simply dull or not extraordinary in the way that
"Poetry" is supposed to be. Not to mention
The poems of trite civic platitudes and
Overheated political rhetoric.
All this is true, and fairly well-known too,
To anyone with minimal powers of observation.
Yet I feel Lerner is writing.
I do not feel this way at all
About poems like Keats's "To Autumn."
In this case, the poem is superior to any abstract
Or honorific, aspirational idea of Poetry with a capital P.
Moreover, the experience of reading poems like this
And even some others that are not quite so great,
Or great in unkeatsian, unpredictable ways,
By Clark Coolidge, Alice Notely or my friend Tony Robinson
(You can put in your own names here)
Far surpasses any disappointment I feel
At the the vast swaths of crappy poetry and
Has given my life the little meaning that it has.
No comments:
Post a Comment